About Patrick Kennedy

Patrick Kennedy is a fourth generation Sacramentan who serves on the Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Education, representing the Oak Park, City Farms, Hollywood Park and the Med Center neighborhoods. In addition to his service on the Sacramento City School Board, Patrick is a private practice attorney and government affairs representative. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Sacramento History Foundation and the Historic California Governor’s Mansion Foundation. In 1993 Sacramento Mayor Joe Serna, Jr. appointed Patrick to the Sacramento City Planning Commission where he served until 2004. Mayor Serna also named him to the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, Oak Park Project Area Committee. Patrick’s long record of involvement in his neighborhoods includes service as President of the Oak Park Neighborhood Improvement Association, founding president of the Hollywood Park Neighborhood Association, member of the Sacramento RT District South Sacramento Citizens’ Advisory Committee, member of the UCD Med Center Expansion Advisory Board and member of the McClellan AFB Reuse Planning Team. He has also served on a number of non profit boards, including the Sacramento Heritage, Sacramento Self Help Housing and the Health Project. Patrick and his wife Judy, an artist and teacher, share their Hollywood Park home with the youngest of their four daughters, Sinead (21) and Chelsea (19), as well as Fiona (a miniature Dachshund), Clancy (an Irish Setter) and Etcetera (an ornery Siamese cat).

208: Sacramento Documentarian Laurence Campling / Sacramento Arts and History, and Charter Commission

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the closing of Folsom’s legendary Candy Store Art Gallery.  While it was open, it was written about in travel guides as one of three must visit places in California, along with Mt. Shasta and Yosemite.  Now our guest, local documentary filmmaker Laurence Campling, is making a feature-length film telling the story of how former Utah Cattle Queen Adeliza McHugh created an influential and vibrant avant –garde art venue in the Sacramento area, championing the early  works of some of the major figures in what came to be known as the Funk Art movement, including Robert Arneson, David Gilhooly, Clayton Bailey and Maija Peeples-Bright.

But Laurence isn’t just about Funk Art.  In this lively conversation, he also shares his insights into Sacramento’s wild west past, and a secret about the airport’s Red Rabbit that you will only hear here.  And if you ever wanted to experience Hamlet in less than five minutes, check out his production here - but be warned, you may get that damned song stuck in your head.

The guys also discuss the recently approved City Charter Commission and what that will mean in the November Election.

This weeks opening music track is “Baby” by The Ventilaters, Th’ Losin’ Streaks take us out with their song “Leaving here”.

The Mayor’s “refocused” arts effort and the big Red Rabbit.

So the Mayor is “refocusing” his efforts on the arts.  Short of press conferences and announcements, I am a little confused about what those efforts have been up until now. I continuously hear from artists in the trenches that they have no idea where the so-called “effort” has benefited actual artists (for full disclosure, I have been married to one of those artists for over two decades).

I usually don’t lift an entire paragraph from the Sacramento Bee, but after reading the story on the subject this morning, I had to read the following three times.  And I am still not sure what it means:

The initiative is focusing on bringing the arts community together with novel projects such as a recently started Flywheel Creative Economy Incubator.  That effort will bring together 10 artists, nonprofits and social entrepreneurs the initiative feels are doing cutting edge work, in a partnership with Sacramento’s Urban Hive.

WTF?  Ok, all the gobbledygook aside, how will “the initiative” determine what “cutting edge work” is, and who will be the arbiter of cutting edge?

With all due respect to the Mayor, I sincerely appreciate him bringing to the light the need to highlight the arts in Sacramento.  But this new effort just sounds a lot like another reason to issue another press release.  I hope I am wrong.

Kudos to the Red Rabbit

Public art is often a touchy subject.  It is the quintessential damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation.  You are just not going to please everybody.  But it is an important part of our region’s landscape.

Two cases in point:  The Indio Arch and the Red Rabbit.

When the City installed Gerald Walburg’s Indio Arch on K Street at 4th Street, it was very controversial.  Back then, City leaders were attacked for spending public money on the piece.  Then fast forward two years and it started showing up on postcards as a cherished Sacramento landmark (still is).

More recently, the Sacramento Metropolitan Arts Commission and the County were criticized for the purchase and installation of the Red Rabbit (“Leap”) in the new gazillion dollar Sacramento International Airport Terminal B.  Everybody seemed to have an opinion on the 56-foot sculpture by Lawrence Argent, and many not good.  Now, it seems like Shelly Willis, Manager of Sacramento’s Art in Public Places program deserves kudos for the selection of the piece, and sooner rather than later.  Leap was recently chosen as one of 50 winning entries (out of 500) by Americans for the Arts Public Art Network.  Look for those postcards shortly.

 

205: Post election coverage by the Sacramento Current Crew

After hitting the election parties and digesting the returns, the guys from Sacramento Current are back at 3rd Bedroom Studio to talk about the June Primary results for local races.

Listen in and see what they have to say about the Mayor’s “mandate”, the turn out, campaign money influence, how ugly one council race got, the “social media candidate” vs. the “thoughtful candidate”, and so much more.  And, as if that wasn’t enough, as an added bonus, you’ll hear more about the Sacramento County Board of Education (the what?) than you ever wanted to.

Folks, this show is rated “WI” for Wonkishly Informative. . . consider yourself warned.

Avoiding the public makes Mayor look weak.

Early on, perhaps even episode one of Sacramento Current, I made a prediction.  I said then that there is no way that Mayor Kevin Johnson avoids a public debate with his opponents.  At the time, I thought the Mayor would at the very least participate in the League of Women Voters forum.  While watched by few and not a format that allows for spirited discussion, at least it would have been an opportunity to see our leader with his opponents.  Sadly, I was wrong.

Whether you are a supporter of Mayor Johnson or a detractor, it doesn’t matter.  The fact is that never before has a sitting Mayor purposefully and systematically avoided meeting with constituents for an open dialogue on what he or she has accomplished (or not) and where he or she will take the CIty in the coming term. 

Is the Mayor going to be re-elected?  Almost certainly.  But that is not the point.  His handlers say that he has not appeared with his opponents because they are not “viable”.  Is that really his/their call?  The people of Sacramento deserve a leader who will look them in the eye and stand toe-to-toe with those who do not agree with him.  The people of Sacramento have been let down.

Capital Public Radio is running ”one minute” with the mayoral candidates video clips on their website.  To view it, click here.  It’s not much, but apparently it’s the best we are going to get.  A sad day for Sacramento.

The Sacramento What Festival?

Hey!  It’s Memorial Day Weekend, and anybody who grew up in Sacramento knows that can mean only one thing:  the sound of rink-a-tink-a-tink, and couples swarming the streets of Old Sacramento wearing matching hats and vests.  Ahhhh yes, that fine Sacramento tradition:  The 275th Annual Jazz Jubilee.

(Insert needle dragging across the record sound effect here).

Actually, the Sacramento Jazz Jubilee; er, the Sacramento Traditional Jazz Festival; er, the Sacramento Jazz Festival and Jubilee (keeping up?) is no more.  Now with minimal fanfare, we introduce the 2012 Sacramento Music Festival.

Claiming to be in its 39th year, which if you believe in reincarnation is perhaps accurate; this annual Sacramento ritual has a new name and completely new lineup.  The problem is, looking at that lineup, it also appears to be suffering from an identity crisis.

Ok, I am the first to admit, along with many of my generation, that the sound of Dixieland Jazz wore thin right around when I stopped riding the gyrating pony at Straw Hat Pizza.  I spent my childhood hoping nobody would offer to take me anywhere near Old Sacramento this time of year.  But at least you knew what it was come Memorial Day Weekend.

According to the new festival’s website, this year’s festival will feature a “full range of great music while still honoring our great jazz tradition:

  • BLUES, ROCK, JAZZ, DANCE BANDS
  • Soulful blues and rockin’ blues
  • Swing and Western swing
  • Cajun and zydeco
  • Country, rockabilly and bluegrass
  • Latin and Mariachi music
  • New Orleans 2nd-line & street beat
  • Straight-ahead & mainstream jazz
  • Ragtime and early jazz
  • Big bands / Orchestras
  • Marching bands
  • Youth bands
  • Banjo performances at the
    CA State Railroad Museum and
    on excursion trains
  • all in addition to Traditional jazz,
    also known as Dixieland or
    classic jazz, inspired by the great Louis Armstrong”.

 That sound you just heard was Satchmo buying an Amtrak ticket to Chicago.

Monterey has its Jazz Festival, Austin has South X Southwest and City Limits, Tennessee has Bonnaroo, hell even Woodstock has made valiant attempts to keep 1969 alive.  Music festivals are a lot of fun and great for local economies.  But it seems to me that you have to know your audience and market to that audience.  By trying to be all things to all people, I fear this festival runs the risk of being nothing to anybody.

The original festival had its day in the (hot) sun.  It was a real Sacramento tradition and brought a lot of attention, and money, to our City.  But, it was the right thing to do to recognize that the traditional Dixieland Jazz theme had run its course as a standalone Sacramento music festival. 

That is not to say that we cannot start something new here that could be, dare I say it, world class.  As a lover of music and someone who thinks that this city boasts musicians that can stand up against musicians in any town, I think the timing is right.  I just question if this latest incarnation is the answer.

Sacramento Current – Episode 13

Sacramento Current sat down for a lively chat with mayoral candidate Jonathan Rewers.  While he may not be as famous as current celebrity-mayor Kevin Johnson or as colorful as self-described world-famous bounty hunter Leonard Padilla, he is not short on ideas or FACTS.  He also more-than-hints at an upcoming major endorsement.

Listen in as this political upstart talks about what he sees is wrong with the city, how he can fix it and why a Republican can be elected mayor in a Democratic town (yeah, yeah, yeah, I know: it’s a nonpartisan race).

This week’s music track is “We All Fall Down” by Lorenzo’s Music. You can download it for free by clicking here.

Sacramento Current – Episode 11

The Band wants to start by again apologizing for the audio issues experienced during the last episode of Sacramento Current.  We debated whether to take it down, but decided that the content was what really matters.  We appreciate everybody who set aside the technical difficulties and enjoyed the episode.  Problems fixed. . . now, on with the show!

This week found us back at 3rd Bedroom Studios with Jimmy Bell at the controls and Sacramento Renaissance Man Tim Foster in the guest chair. From Tim, we learn about life after Midtown Monthly, more about the amazing Sacramento Living Library series, and dive into the Sacramento music scene. Tim is a veteran musician and journalist from Sacramento and shares a lot of unique insights.

We also get into some City Council races, most notably District 8, where incumbent Bonnie Pannell is facing challenger and Kevin Johnson ally (at least that what the signs say), Betty Williams.  Look for more in-depth City Council race coverage in an upcoming episode.

Finally, in addition to somehow managing to again talk about the dead dead dead arena, we muse about our seemingly shutter-happy Mayor, and heap praise on a well deserved, though terribly modest, Cosmo Garvin for the recent honors bestowed on him by the California Newspaper Publishers Association.

We hope you enjoy the show.  Please don’t hesitate to let us know if there is a particular subject or guest you would like us to feature in the future.  And your comments are always welcome.

Music this week:

“Fine Line,” by Th’ Losin Streaks

“I’m Alright,” by Agent Ribbons

For more information:

Get your wonk on at Capitol Weekly

Read “The Oxycontin Kid,” if you want to. It’s kind of wild.

 

Claw versus bin? How ’bout dead cats?

Lunch Spoiler Alert:  If you are squeamish, you might want to skip this particular post.  And if you are an animal lover, before you yell at me, please know that I am too.

Ok.  Much has been discussed about the great Sacramento “Claw versus Bin” debate.  We all know the drill.  Half of Sacramento think it is a God-given right to have their yard waste picked up off the street every week and the other half think it’s a waste of scarce public funds.  I get it.  Really, I do.  But I want to add to the following question to this important public discourse:  what about dead bloating cats?

So, here’s what happened.  On a recent Monday, a seemingly well-fed cat met its demise on my neighbor’s driveway, a driveway that abuts my driveway.  On Tuesday, my wife (who we will call Yoko to protect the innocent) does what she has been told to do at numerous neighborhood meetings:  call 311!  While the cat was not in our yard, Yoko wanted to spare the kids at the house the disturbing sight of a cat in the beginning stages of rigor mortis.  She’s like that.

The 311 taped messages informed us that if callers want quicker service, they are encouraged to email, which Yoko did.

She received a nice email from the 311 call center telling her:

“Thank you for using our online service. Small animals under 10 lbs can be disposed of in the garbage can. If the resident does not want to put it in the garbage can they can leave it at the curb for Animal Care. Animal Care officers work 8am-10pm daily, we can add this address to the list and someone can respond to pick up the cat but it can possibly take a few days.”

A little gross, but fair enough.

Then as I am sitting at my desk slaving over another Sacramento Current episode (because we obviously are meticulous in our preparation), I see a classroom of kids walking toward my house delivering May Day flowers.  This, of course put me on red alert as I sprinted to the garage to find a tarp to cover our new friend before scarring those kids and ruining May Day forever in their minds.  Mission accomplished.

To make a long story short, the body was finally boxed and placed on the curb because garbage day seemed too far away and the weather was getting warm – you can fill in the rest.  And there it sat. . . and sat. . . and sat.

So for the next several days, we got to witness surprised dog walkers, hungry cats (apparently a dead cat smelling like kimchi is a delicacy in the feline world), and what may be the largest fly convention since Jeff Goldbloom headlined at Comic-Con.

Finally, six days later, our new neighbor disappeared into the night.  One assumes, and hopes, it was picked up by animal control.

I know that we all have to suck it up in these difficult times.  I know the City has seen devastating cuts and unprecedented layoffs.  But this small incident again reminded me how we need to look at all of our City services and prioritize what is really important.  For those who support the more expensive claw, and I am on record as not being in that camp, shouldn’t those costs instead be allocated toward more pressing needs with public health implications?  At least in this economy?  Or better yet, If the City has $680,000 lying around in the future, as it did prior to chasing an arena, maybe we can look a little harder at what City services those funds could help restore.

Just a little catfood for thought.

A letter to Mayor Serna

I am one of dozens of people of my generation in Sacramento who count Mayor Joe Serna, Jr. as my mentor.  As my teacher, council member, alcalde and friend in the 1980’s and through the 1990’s, he helped shape my commitment to local government and public service.  When important issues face our city, I frequently find myself reflecting and wondering what he would do in these circumstances, and what advice would be give me.  I can’t claim to know what Joe would say during the debates that seem to consume Sacramento of late, nor would I ever be as presumptuous as to speculate.  But I often think of the words he did share, and I think I know what I would say to him if he were here:

Dear Joe,

You would be happy to know that your impact on the affairs of Sacramento hasn’t diminished much over the past decade.  Your name is invoked, often by both sides, whenever an important and controversial issue faces our city.  If I had a dollar for every time I heard someone say, “Joe Serna would have. . . “, I could probably build myself a very large public amenity in the downtown rail yards.  Lately, two issues have made me think a great deal about you :  strong mayor and the arena.

While the issue of “strong mayor” has not been on the agenda for some time, there is great speculation that it will again rear its head in one form or another, particularly if the current Mayor is successful in getting his allies elected to the City Council in June and/or November.

You and I had many conversations on this topic while you were Mayor.  I remember you saying that you felt the City had grown to the point where it was in need of a charter change that would give the mayor greater opportunity to govern.  Of course at the time the position was not a full-time position, and that is what you complained about most.  That has since changed and you would be happy to know that the mayor is now given the opportunity to devote the time necessary to do the job.

Whatever form the change should take, I also remember you being adamant about one thing.  You were very clear of your intention to run for a third term and final term.  You planned to propose a change only if re-elected to a third term, so it would take effect during the tenure of your successor.  As you said, to do otherwise would appear too self-serving.  Unfortunately that third term was not to be.

Lately, all of this talk of arena is somewhat reminiscent of an issue you faced when you worked with civic leaders, led by Greg Luckenbill, to lure the Raiders to Sacramento.  I remember after a long rancorous public meeting at the Community Center, when the deal appeared to be on the verge of falling apart, you said putting up that much public money to lure a sports franchise to town was the “biggest mistake” or your political life.  After much time has passed and emotions are long since calmed, I am not sure I would agree with that harsh self-evaluation, but I do understand the sentiment.  The $50 Million the city and county raised in bonds to get the deal done was a huge risk, albeit not a $300 Million risk, but the deal was conservatively constructed in a way that ensured that the City would always be made whole.  As a result, while we didn’t get the Raiders, we did get a refurbished Community Center, Memorial Auditorium and numerous other city projects that have been enjoyed by a generation and help make our city great.

Admirably, you knew when to admit that the deal wasn’t going through, step back and look toward tomorrow without creating a festering wound in our city.  You set deadlines, and you held all parties to them.  When it was clear the time had come, you moved on.  But that didn’t mean you were a defeatist, for it wasn’t long before you were donning a green and gold baseball cap emblazoned with “Sacramento” and exclaiming “Play Ball”.  You showed me that a leader knows it is important to aim high, yet also show the patience and maturity to wait for another day – another example of putting the interests of the city before your own agenda.

Joe, this is the great city you always said it was.  It can be the great city you always dreamed it would be.  We will have our bumps in the road, but I think if we consider your example from time to time, we will get there in a more civil way, worthy of your past leadership and deserving of all Sacramentans.

Yours,

Patrick

PS.  Any advice you can give on getting a school bond passed would be greatly appreciated. 

That I will save for another letter, another day.

Matsui / Feinstein or Lungren / Boehner: Is there really any question who is leading the charge for safer levees?

On Episode 3 of Sacramento Current, the band talked about the secret levee tour Rep. Dan Lungren gave Speaker John Boehner on March 12th.  This “tour” was seen by many as a mere detour for the two lawmakers as they traveled between a Lungren fundraiser and an event held to add to the war chest of the Republican National Congressional Committee.  According to the Sacramento Bee, Lungren himself admitted that the two did not get “mud on our shoes”.  

Lacking was a briefing by local levee experts from SAFCA, the Army Corps of Engineers, or any local leaders for that matter, and the Speaker, the nation’s most powerful Republican lawmaker, made no promises for greater flood protection for Sacramento.  A cynic might call that an opportunity to turn a political fundraising junket into a tax payer paid “fact-finding mission”.  But the band at Sacramento Current is anything but cynical.

Juxtapose that tour against the one led yesterday by Rep. Doris Matsui and Sen. Diane Feinstein, where the Congresswoman and rain-soaked, baseball cap wearing Senator met with regional flood / levee experts and leaders from throughout the area.  Matsui, a longtime and open crusader for greater flood protection, and Feinstein toured the levees and were fully briefed on the work that has been done to improve them.  More importantly, they saw first-hand the work that still needs to be done (and funded) to make the region safe.  One might even venture to say that they got a little mud on their shoes.