River Oaks: the Ohio of District 4

Remember the jubilation most of us in Sacramento felt on election night when Barrack Obama was declared the winner at about 8:15 pm? Well our Sacramento City Council candidates still have their champagne on ice. When we all went to bed on election night, both races were too close to call. It is a week and a half later and that hasn’t changed.

So, like clockwork, politicos like myself head to the county’s election website and start hitting refresh. Refresh, refresh, refresh. I can only imagine (since I don’t care enough to ask) how much their traffic must spike on update days around 3 pm.

As of the Thursday update, in council District 2 Rob Kerth clings to a 155 vote lead over Allen Warren, while Steve Hansen enjoys a slightly larger 160 vote spread over Joe Yee in District 4. As Steve’s emails and facebook updates consistently remind us, the race is too close to call and we need to count every vote.

But no, this article is not one more in a long line about how close the races are. It is about the breakdown of District 4. Before the process devolved into apportioning the massive number of voters who live at Sacramento Charter High and in the Medical Center, one of the most interesting storylines was bringing The Grid together within a single district, instead of split into three as it had been previously. It was paired with Land Park and River Oaks (ROCA in chart below) in the new district. With most of the voters divided close to evenly between Land Park and The Grid, it was not surprising that each neighborhood sent a strong candidate into the general election.

Most expected the candidates’ home neighborhoods to support them strongly. Some thought the strong reliability of Land Park voters would carry Joe Yee into office. Others thought the fact that The Grid has more voters would get Steve over the top. Many forgot that River Oaks exists.

So, down to the numbers. This is based on the 11/15 update, which includes almost all mail votes, but still has 31,000 provisional ballots outstanding. How did each candidate fare in their home neighborhoods? It turns out, quite similarly.

Both candidates won their home neighborhoods by a score of 57-43. Steve seems to have benefited from the Obama wave and his own extensive turnout operation (which, in the interests of disclosure, I was a volunteer for), as The Grid cast 785 more votes in this race than Land Park, which netted him a 77 vote lead between the two largest neighborhoods. Voters on The Grid certainly benefit from being drawn into an even numbered district, which are perpetually aligned with the higher turnout presidential elections, and could undercut Land Park’s typical advantage in voter turnout.

Most of Steve’s lead, though, was earned in oft-overlooked River Oaks. It only made up 10% of the total vote and was closer than the larger neighborhoods, but Steve’s 4% advantage added 83 votes to his lead. This district is almost certainly going to be highly competitive as long as it maintains this alignment. I think it’s safe to assume, River Oaks will be getting a lot of attention from incumbents and challengers alike.

 

Politics and alcohol; what could possibly go wrong?

Let’s talk policy! And get drunk!

The two candidates for Sacramento’s City Council race in District 2 will participate in their last debate this Tuesday night when Joe Yee and Steve Hansen square off in a town hall-style forum held by The Sacramento Press at the Cosmopolitan Cabaret theater on K Street. While the event is sure to be insightful and enlightening, it’s what’s going on afterwards that may provide the most memorable quotes of the evening.

The KBar is hosting a post-debate function called DRINK SPECIALS FOR DEMOCRACY where policy wonks and political pundits can score a glass of red or white wine for just $3 bucks, select beers for just $2, and an as-yet-unnamed speciality cocktail for $5 a pop. Who ever said local politics are dull?

Actually, if you really wanted to liven things up a bit, they should start with the drink specials beforehand, and keep ‘em coming fast and strong for the candidates. Hell, let’s make a contest out of it. Last man standing after a shot-a-thon gets bragging rights. Or at the very least they should try to keep the audience lubricated to foster off-the-cuff and random questions for the would-be councilmembers.

Going forward, I hope we’ll make the option of consuming hard spirits at all political gatherings mandatory. Lord only knows we need more civic participation in this town. Maybe booze is the answer to getting more butts in the seats at City Hall on Tuesday nights.

If you want to attend the debate, you can RSVP by clicking here.

The M Factor: Angelique Ashby is giving City’s “impartial” analysis of Measure M? How does that work?

The City of Sacramento is supposed to stay neutral on local ballot measures. City employees can’t use their office to promote or oppose measures, city resources can’t be used to help campaigns. Easy enough, right?

And yet, the City’s Neighborhood Services Division is giving the leader of the “No on Measure M” campaign top billing at community meetings about that ballot question.

Measure M, you’ll recall, is the question on forming a Sacramento Charter Commission. Neighborhood Services held a meeting on Measure M last night, at Hart Senior Center. Here’s what happened, according to charter commission candidate Anna Molander and another Measure M supporter, Rick Bettis.

The agenda for the Monday night meeting included, among other topics, zoning changes, information about neighborhood watch, Measure M and Measure T (the claw).

Supporters of Measure M asked if they could have someone make the pitch for the measure at the meeting. But, according to Molander they were told no, because this City-sponsored event was just going to include an impartial presentation of the facts and an opportunity for citizens to ask questions.

But the person giving the “impartial” presentation of the facts was in fact city council member Angelique Ashby, who is leading the opposition to Measure M. She signed the ballot argument against the measure, and has steadfastly argued from the dais that it’s unneeded and too expensive. She has routinely voted with Mayor Kevin Johnson on this and other governance issues, like strong mayor. She’s close to the public safety unions, which have been strongly opposed to the charter commission (and for strong mayor). In short, Ashby is not impartial. She is as partial as they come.  (I’ve got calls in to Ashby and to Vincene Jones at Neighborhood Services, but no response yet.)

Rick Bettis, an activist with Common Cause and League of Women Voters attended the whole meeting and said that Ashby played it pretty straight–she disclosed her opposition to Measure M upfront, but mostly kept her opinion out of her presentation. Bettis supports Measure M, and so he was keen to correct Ashby when, he says, she told audience members there was no organized “yes” campaign, and that the end result of the Los Angeles charter commission experiment was a strong mayor form of government. (That’s part of it, but they also got an ethics commission and neighborhood councils, and other reforms.)

No matter how impartial Ashby tried to act at this meeting, it’s not appropriate for her to be the voice of the City on this matter. Before this meeting, Ashby posted on her Facebook page, “Busy day ahead, including two community meetings to ask folks to please Vote NO on Measure M…”

Then we’re supposed to trust that she’ll present the information on Measure M fairly? That’s a lot to ask.

In fact candidate Molander thinks it’s illegal to give the “No” side a venue and not giving equal time to representatives from the “Yes” side.  “The City is not permitted to spend public funds to support or oppose ballot measure, particularly where the opposing view is offered no opportunity to speak. The public now perceives the City as opposing Measure M although the City has taken no such position,” Molander said in letter she sent this afternoon to the City attorney.

It may be a stretch to say this meeting had a big impact on public perception, one way or the other. Bettis said there were about 7 people in the audience. Still, Ashby is a politician who wants to raise her profile and be seen as leading on this issue. The City gave her a venue and denied it to the other side.

“It un-leveled the playing field,” she told me. “I want to know what the City is going to do to make this right for the people who support Measure M, and who are running. I don’t have the same kind of money that Ashby does.”

And there are more meetings scheduled with Ashby giving her “impartial” analysis, including one on Wednesday night. Even if Ashby thinks she can be fair, why pick her for the job? I know there have been budget cuts and there are fewer staff around. But really, there’s no one on staff who’s at least plausibly impartial who can give this information to the public?

Dear Mr. Netto: First one’s free

Dear Mr. Netto,

My condolences go out to you in regards to your recent City Council bid. It seems that the people of District 6 were unconvinced by your platform and barrage of posted signs, which still blanket our neighborhoods by the way. In the spirit of full disclosure, I did not vote for you and personally found your methods of communication with my community to be uninspiring. It seemed like you weren’t sure why you were running for the seat except to constantly remind us that Kevin McCarty is probably going to run for the Assembly in 2014. Dude, we already knew that. It’s like, the worst kept secret in South Sacramento, second only to who was sitting in Robbie Waters car that fateful night way-back-when. If you truly had your finger on the pulse of the neighborhood, you would have attacked something sillier like McCarty’s Soda Tax. Anywho, I digress…

Damn thing nearly fills up my truck bed!

Now that your campaign is over, I hope you’ll be quick to dispatch your volunteers to remove the GIGANTIC signs plastered all over the District. I mean, just look at that thing; you can nearly see it from space. I was on my way home this evening, and I had a pair of clippers in my truck as is my habit, and decided to get the ball rolling. Don’t worry about the sign you erected on 59th and T, I got that one for ya, bro

As for the dozens more I didn’t get tonight, please see to it that they’re removed in a timely fashion. Thanks!

Sincerely,

City-Wonk Gonzalez

P.S. Better luck next time?

205: Post election coverage by the Sacramento Current Crew

After hitting the election parties and digesting the returns, the guys from Sacramento Current are back at 3rd Bedroom Studio to talk about the June Primary results for local races.

Listen in and see what they have to say about the Mayor’s “mandate”, the turn out, campaign money influence, how ugly one council race got, the “social media candidate” vs. the “thoughtful candidate”, and so much more.  And, as if that wasn’t enough, as an added bonus, you’ll hear more about the Sacramento County Board of Education (the what?) than you ever wanted to.

Folks, this show is rated “WI” for Wonkishly Informative. . . consider yourself warned.

Current Shots – Election night in Sacramento

Two members of the Sacramento Current team, Patrick Kennedy and Isaac Gonzalez, spent election night jumping between some of the various City Council campaign headquarters. This is the raw audio.

We began the night at the home of Jonathan Rewers, then ran into Leonard Padilla. From there, we visited Joe Yee and Kevin McCarty, only to drive all the way to Bonnie Pannell’s event in South Sacramento and then to Rob Kerth’s in North Sacramento.

It was a wild night, and we hope you’ll enjoy the ride.

Interview with Write-In Candidate for Mayor, Edgar Hilbert-Garcia

While there are four candidates on the ballot to chose from for Mayor of Sacramento, there are actually five candidates in the race. Edgar Hibert-Garcia has qualified as a write-in candidate for Mayor, creating a fifth choice for Mayor. He recently sat down for coffee and and a conversation with one member of the Sacramento Current podcast team.

You can find out more about Hilbert-Garcia by visiting his website. The election is June 5th.

Interview with Kevin McCarty now online

Kevin McCarty, the incumbent running for a third straight term in Sacramento’s District 6, recently sat down with two members of the Sacramento Current podcast team to share his take on local issues. You can hear the interview for yourself by clicking here.